Skip to content
Containment & Tank Coatings

Professional Containment Coatings & Tank Lining Systems

Secondary containment linings, tank coatings, and sump linings using novolac epoxy and vinyl ester systems for chemical storage and hazardous material areas.

5.0 (60+ Reviews) 20+ Years Experience 50+ In-House Crew 24/7 Operations

Secondary Containment: The Last Line of Defense Against Chemical Releases

Secondary containment systems exist because primary containment — tanks, pipes, drums, and vessels — can and does fail. Spills, overfills, equipment failures, seismic events, and operational errors release millions of gallons of hazardous chemicals into secondary containment systems every year. When those secondary containment linings perform correctly, the chemical is captured, cleaned up, and the incident is a recordable event. When the lining fails, the chemical reaches soil, groundwater, or storm drains — triggering environmental enforcement, significant remediation costs, and potentially catastrophic regulatory consequences.

The EPA’s Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule and many state environmental regulations mandate secondary containment for above-ground chemical and petroleum storage. These regulations require that containment systems be impermeable and capable of holding the volume of the largest tank they protect. Meeting this standard requires more than pouring a concrete berm — it requires a protective lining system that will maintain chemical impermeability for the service life of the storage system.

Epoxy Flooring Pro installs secondary containment linings, tank interior and exterior coatings, and waterproofing systems for chemical storage, petroleum products, waste management, and industrial process applications. Every containment project we complete includes written documentation suitable for inclusion in your SPCC plan or environmental compliance files.

Secondary containment berm coating with novolac epoxy lining system for chemical storage area

Understanding Coating Chemistry for Containment Applications

The selection of coating chemistry for containment applications is not a matter of preference — it is a technical decision driven by the specific chemical resistance requirements of the application. Using the wrong coating chemistry guarantees eventual failure.

Standard Bisphenol-A Epoxy

The foundation of industrial coating technology, BPA epoxy provides good resistance to dilute acids, alkalis, water, and many salts. It is appropriate for containment of aqueous solutions, dilute chemical spills, and petroleum products at low temperatures. Standard epoxy coating is NOT adequate for concentrated aromatic solvents, concentrated acids, oxidizing chemicals, or applications requiring elevated service temperatures.

Novolac Epoxy

Novolac epoxy — also called epoxy novolac or phenol-formaldehyde novolac — is a specialty epoxy chemistry with a higher cross-link density than standard BPA epoxy. The additional cross-linking provides:

  • Resistance to aromatic solvents including toluene, xylene, MEK, and acetone
  • Resistance to concentrated sulfuric acid (up to 70%), hydrochloric acid, and many organic acids
  • Improved resistance to elevated temperatures (continuous service to 300°F+)
  • Higher solvent resistance for chemical process environments

For chemical storage facilities, solvent storage areas, and battery rooms, novolac epoxy is the minimum appropriate coating chemistry.

Vinyl Ester Linings

Vinyl ester systems represent the highest chemical resistance tier in commonly applied containment coatings. Based on vinyl ester resin chemistry rather than epoxy chemistry, these systems provide resistance to:

  • Fuming acids including fuming sulfuric acid and fuming nitric acid
  • Strong oxidizing chemicals including concentrated hydrogen peroxide
  • Bleach and sodium hypochlorite at concentrated levels
  • Mixed chemical exposure with unknown or variable compositions
  • Elevated temperature chemical immersion service

Vinyl ester systems require more complex application procedures and more stringent surface preparation than epoxy systems, but they are the only appropriate specification for the most demanding containment environments.

Vinyl ester lining application in chemical storage tank interior with fiberglass mat reinforcement

Containment Failure Points: Where Linings Break Down

Understanding where containment linings fail is essential for designing systems that do not repeat those failures. In our experience inspecting failed containment linings, failures cluster at predictable locations:

Construction Joints and Cracks

Concrete is not a monolithic material — it shrinks, moves, and develops cracks throughout its service life. Construction joints between the berm floor and walls, control joints in large containment slabs, and structural cracks all represent discontinuities in the substrate that create high stress concentrations in the coating system above. When the concrete moves, the coating is forced to stretch or delaminate at these points.

Our approach: All joints and cracks receive specific repair treatment, followed by fiberglass woven mat embedded in the first coat of the containment lining. The fiberglass mat provides crack bridging capacity — it can accommodate small movements without the lining above developing a pinhole. Mat reinforcement is applied at all joint locations as a standard practice, not an optional add-on.

Floor-to-Wall Transitions

The cove or fillet at the junction of the containment floor and the berm wall is a high-stress detail that is frequently applied incorrectly. If the coating bridges the corner without a formed cove, it spans a stress concentration point and typically cracks at the corner profile under thermal cycling. We form proper radius coves in all floor-to-wall transitions and embed fiberglass mat in the cove to ensure structural integrity of the detail.

Penetrations

Pipes, conduits, and structural elements penetrating through a containment structure are every containment engineer’s greatest concern. Each penetration is a potential bypass path for chemical to circumvent the coating system entirely. We install appropriate penetration collars, boot flashings, or mechanical seals depending on the specific penetration type and chemical exposure. All penetrations are spark-tested with particular attention because they are the highest-risk holiday locations.

Waterproofing for Below-Grade Structures

Not all containment challenges involve chemical resistance. Underground vaults, sumps, pump pits, and utility structures are regularly subjected to hydrostatic groundwater pressure that drives moisture through concrete joints and cracks. We apply waterproofing systems that address this different challenge:

Negative-Side Crystalline Waterproofing: For structures with active groundwater infiltration, crystalline waterproofing materials applied to the interior (negative side) react with water and cement to form insoluble crystals within the concrete pores, progressively sealing the substrate from within.

Positive-Side Membrane Systems: For new construction or dry substrate conditions, positive-side membrane systems applied to the exterior face of below-grade structures prevent moisture from entering the concrete in the first place.

Interior Coating Waterproofing: High-build epoxy or polyurethane systems applied to the interior of below-grade structures provide a physical barrier to moisture transmission while also offering the chemical resistance benefits appropriate for structures containing process fluids.

Concrete sump waterproofing and protective lining installation underground utility vault

SPCC Compliance: Documentation That Satisfies Regulators

EPA SPCC regulations require that secondary containment systems be capable of containing the largest single vessel they protect plus freeboard for precipitation, and that they be free of cracks or gaps that would allow discharge. For regulated facilities, our containment lining projects include documentation specifically structured to support SPCC plan compliance:

  • Written specification with chemical resistance rationale for selected coating chemistry
  • Surface preparation records per SSPC standards with profile measurements
  • Application records: product lot numbers, batch quantities, mixing ratios, application temperatures and humidity
  • Film thickness measurements at specified intervals
  • Holiday test report per NACE SP0188 with all holiday locations, repair records, and retest confirmation
  • Photographs documenting all stages of surface preparation and application

This documentation package is provided at project completion and is structured for direct inclusion in your SPCC plan amendment records.

Tank Interior Coating: Immersion Service Requirements

Tank interior coating for chemical storage, potable water, wastewater, and fuel service is among the most demanding coating application work — and among the most consequential if done incorrectly. Interior coatings experience full chemical immersion 24 hours per day and any failure of the coating system exposes the tank shell to direct chemical damage.

Surface preparation for immersion service requires abrasive blasting of steel surfaces to SSPC-SP 10 or SP 5 — near-white or white metal — because any mill scale, rust, or contamination remaining under an immersion-service coating will cause premature failure. For concrete tanks, surface preparation must achieve ICRI CSP 5–6 minimum to ensure adequate mechanical anchor profile for the thick coating systems required.

We apply immersion-service coatings in multiple coats with full cure and holiday testing between each coat, ensuring that the final system has complete coverage, correct total film thickness, and no pinholes that would allow the contained chemical to reach the substrate.

Contact our containment coating specialists to discuss your specific chemical exposure profile and receive a technically appropriate lining specification for your containment or tank project.

What's Included

Secondary containment linings for chemical storage berms and dyke areas
Novolac epoxy systems for aromatic solvent and concentrated acid resistance
Vinyl ester linings for fuming acid, oxidizing chemical, and solvent resistance
Waterproofing systems for below-grade vaults, sumps, and utility structures
Tank interior and exterior coatings for chemical, fuel, and water storage
Crack-bridging membrane systems for structural containment integrity
Fiberglass mat reinforcement for monolithic containment integrity
Holiday testing and spark testing for verified coating continuity

Our Containment & Tank Installation Process

01

Chemical Exposure Analysis

We begin every containment and tank coating project by obtaining the complete list of chemicals stored or handled in the containment area — including CAS numbers, concentrations, temperatures, and exposure duration scenarios. We cross-reference this list against the chemical resistance data for multiple coating system options before recommending a specification. The wrong coating chemistry will fail rapidly and potentially create a more serious release scenario than an uncoated substrate.

02

Substrate Investigation and Defect Mapping

Containment structures and tank interiors are inspected for cracks, spalls, honeycombing, construction joints, penetrations, and existing coating failure. All defects are mapped and photographed. Moisture testing is performed — containment structures are often in contact with groundwater or subjected to hydrostatic pressure that must be addressed in the specification. Any active leaks are treated before coating proceeds.

03

Surface Preparation to SSPC Standards

Concrete containment surfaces are prepared by shot blasting, grinding, or high-pressure water jetting to achieve ICRI CSP 4–6 for thick coating systems. Steel surfaces are abrasive blasted to SSPC-SP 10 (Near-White Metal) or SSPC-SP 5 (White Metal) for immersion service. All joint details, penetrations, and transitions receive specific preparation treatment. Anchor profile is measured and documented before coating proceeds.

04

Repair and Crack Bridging

All cracks, construction joints, and penetration details are treated before the primary coating is applied. Positive-side waterproofing mortars seal active leaks. Structural cracks receive [repair treatment](/concrete-joint-repair/) appropriate to the movement classification. Penetrations are fitted with appropriate collars and flashing materials. Fiberglass mat reinforcement is embedded over all joints and transition details to provide bridging capacity in the primary coating system.

05

Primary Coating System Application

The specified coating system — novolac epoxy, vinyl ester, or standard epoxy depending on chemical exposure requirements — is applied in multiple coats to achieve the specified total dry film thickness (typically 40–120 mils DFT for primary containment applications). Each coat is inspected for defects before the subsequent coat is applied. Film thickness is measured at defined intervals throughout application.

06

Holiday Testing and Acceptance

Completed coating systems on containment structures and tank interiors are subjected to holiday (spark) testing per NACE SP0188 to identify pinholes or voids that would compromise the containment integrity. Any holidays detected are repaired and retested. A written test report documenting all test locations and results is provided. Water flood testing of containment berms is available as final verification.

Why Choose Epoxy Flooring Pro

Chemical Resistance Expertise

Selecting the correct coating chemistry for chemical containment is a technical decision that requires actual knowledge of polymer chemistry and chemical resistance data — not just catalog selection. We have application experience with all major containment coating types and can explain in detail why a specific system is appropriate for your chemical exposure profile.

NACE-Informed Application Standards

Our containment and tank coating work follows NACE (now AMPP) surface preparation and application standards — the recognized technical authority for industrial corrosion protection coatings. We specify SSPC surface preparation grades, measure anchor profiles, track coating application conditions, and conduct holiday testing per applicable NACE standards.

Detail Work is Our Strength

Containment coating failures almost always occur at details: joints, penetrations, coves, and transitions. These are the areas that require the most skill and attention. Our crews are specifically trained on detail treatment for containment applications — including fiberglass mat embedding, penetration collar installation, and cove formation — because we know that the field failures happen at the details.

Holiday Testing on Every Project

We perform holiday (spark) testing on every containment application as standard procedure — not as an optional add-on. We have observed projects where holiday testing found dozens of pinholes not visible to the naked eye. In a containment application, a single pinhole allows chemical penetration to the substrate. Testing is not optional.

Documentation for Regulatory Compliance

Secondary containment systems are subject to EPA Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) requirements and state environmental regulations. We provide complete application documentation — surface preparation records, coating lot numbers, film thickness measurements, application conditions, and holiday test results — to support your regulatory compliance records.

Project Gallery

Containment & Tank Coatings project 1
Containment & Tank Coatings project 2
Containment & Tank Coatings project 3
Containment & Tank Coatings project 4
Containment & Tank Coatings project 5

What Our Clients Say

"We needed to reline four chemical storage berms that had developed coating failures after exposure to sulfuric acid. Epoxy Flooring Pro assessed the chemical exposure correctly and specified a novolac epoxy system rather than the standard epoxy the previous contractor had used. That detail — the difference between standard and novolac — is exactly what was needed. The new lining has been in perfect service for 18 months and passed our last SPCC inspection."
Brian Kowalczyk
Environmental Manager, Specialty Chemical Manufacturer
"Our underground utility vault was leaking groundwater through hairline cracks in the concrete walls and floor. Their crew properly treated the active leaks, installed crack bridging membranes, and applied a full waterproofing and protective lining system. The vault has been completely dry for eight months. The photographic documentation they provided was excellent for our engineering records."
Theresa Novak
Infrastructure Manager, Municipal Utility
"Holiday testing after the first coat application revealed 12 pinholes we never would have found visually. Every one was repaired and retested before the next coat went on. That's the kind of quality control that matters on a chemical containment application. We trust this floor to contain whatever gets spilled on it, and it has proven that trust multiple times already."
Steven Barrera
EHS Director, Petroleum Products Distribution Facility

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between novolac epoxy and standard bisphenol-A epoxy for chemical containment?
Standard bisphenol-A (BPA) epoxy is the most common industrial epoxy chemistry and performs well for many applications. However, it has limitations in highly aggressive chemical environments — particularly concentrated acids, aromatic solvents (toluene, xylene, MEK), and oxidizing chemicals. Novolac epoxy uses a different curing chemistry that creates a higher cross-link density in the cured film, resulting in significantly better resistance to aromatic solvents, concentrated acids (including sulfuric acid above 30%), and elevated temperatures. When a containment area will see these exposures, standard epoxy is not adequate and novolac epoxy is the appropriate specification. For the most aggressive exposures — fuming acids, strong oxidizers, or mixed chemical exposure with unknown concentrations — vinyl ester systems provide even higher resistance than novolac epoxy.
How thick should a secondary containment coating be?
The appropriate coating thickness for secondary containment depends on the chemical exposure severity, the substrate condition, and the regulatory requirements. For light-duty containment (incidental spills, water or aqueous solutions), a 20–30 mil total system is often adequate. For medium-duty containment (acids, bases, solvents), 40–60 mils with fiberglass mat reinforcement at joints is typical. For immersion service or exposure to highly aggressive chemicals, systems from 80 to 120+ mils are specified, often using multiple coats of high-build material. EPA SPCC regulations require that containment systems be 'capable of containing the largest single tank' and 'free of cracks or gaps' — thickness is one factor in meeting these requirements, but coating chemistry and application integrity are equally important.
Can concrete containment structures be coated even if they show cracks or construction joints?
Yes — and in fact, concrete containment structures almost always have cracks and construction joints that must be properly addressed to create a reliable barrier. Hairline and dormant cracks are treated with rigid repair mortar or crack-bridging membrane and then covered with fiberglass mat embedded in the primary coating system. Active cracks receive semi-rigid treatment to accommodate movement before the primary system is applied. Construction joints receive similar treatment — the joint detail is the primary path for liquid penetration and must be treated as a critical detail. The key is that these features must be addressed, not simply coated over.
What is holiday testing and is it required for all containment coatings?
Holiday testing uses an electrical spark or wet sponge device to detect pinholes, holidays, and thin spots in a coating film that would allow liquid penetration to the substrate. For containment applications, we consider holiday testing mandatory — not optional. Even experienced applicators producing high-quality work will occasionally create pinholes that are invisible to the naked eye. A single pinhole in a chemical containment lining allows penetration to the concrete substrate, which the chemical will then attack and degrade over time until the containment fails. Spark testing (high-voltage) is used for thicker coating systems; wet sponge testing (low-voltage) for thinner systems. All holidays detected are repaired and retested before the project is accepted.
How do you approach tank interior coating projects where access is limited?
Tank interior coating work requires specific planning for confined space entry. We have personnel certified in confined space procedures under OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146, including entry supervisors, authorized entrants, and attendants. All interior coating work follows our written confined space program, including atmospheric monitoring, continuous ventilation during application, communication protocols, and emergency rescue procedures. Surface preparation in confined spaces typically uses vacuum-shrouded grinding equipment rather than open-blast to manage dust and media in the confined environment. We provide a complete confined space entry plan for review and approval before any interior work begins.

Get a Free Estimate for Containment & Tank

Our project managers are ready to assess your facility and recommend the optimal containment & tank solution.